Widok
Prezydent Bush oświadczył w orędziu w poniedziałek wieczorem, że do inwazji dojdzie, jeśli Saddam Husajn w ciągu 48 godzin nie
Siły koalicji pod wodzą USA wejdą do Iraku, aby go rozbroić, nawet jeśli prezydent Saddam Husajn wyjedzie - zapowiedział rzecznik prasowy Białego Domu Ari Fleischer.
A ponadto Pan Bush zaapelował w swoim orędziu, aby Irakijczycy nie niszczyli szybów naftowych, bo na 100% przydadzą sie one po wojnie - TO DOPIERO HIPOKRYZJA !!!
A ponadto Pan Bush zaapelował w swoim orędziu, aby Irakijczycy nie niszczyli szybów naftowych, bo na 100% przydadzą sie one po wojnie - TO DOPIERO HIPOKRYZJA !!!
GOD in three persons =Bush +Blair+You
China's new leaders pressed ahead Tuesday with efforts to avoid military conflict in Iraq, insisting that U.N. weapons inspections must continue despite President Bush's ultimatum to Saddam Hussein.
That diplomatic offensive came as Japan praised Bush for his decisive stance and Australia offered troops for his campaign — displaying some of the deep divisions around the world over Bush's demand that Saddam step down by Wednesday night or face war.
"It was a decision that had to be made, " Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said.
Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa called off a possible last-minute peacemaking trip to Iraq on Tuesday, in what appeared to signal the end of Arab efforts to avert a war.
"Due to developments we've witnessed in the last few hours, it won't be possible for the secretary-general to visit Baghdad, " said his spokesman, Hisham Youssef.
Last week, Baghdad asked a high-level Arab League peace committee to indefinitely postpone a visit. Iraq has expressed unhappiness with the level of support it has received from a deeply divided Arab world.
Chinese President Hu Jintao, meanwhile, spoke by phone with his Russian and French counterparts, emphasizing Beijing's opposition to war with Iraq, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported.
Hu, the Communist Party leader who replaced Jiang Zemin as president on Saturday, told Russian President Vladimir Putin that "the door to peace should not be shut and China has made great efforts in this regard, " Xinhua said. It said Hu expressed similar sentiments to French President Jacques Chirac.
The phone conversations followed an appeal by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao at a news conference, his first since taking office this weekend, for "every effort" to avoid military conflict.
Putin on Monday condemned military action against Iraq, warning that war would be a mistake that could pose a grave risk to international security.
Germany and France also railed against Bush's tough stance.
"Does the threat posed by the Iraqi dictator justify a war, which is sure to kill thousands of innocent children, women and men? My answer in this case was and is: No, " German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder declared.
Chirac said a war without the support of the United Nations would undermine future efforts at peaceful disarmament. France led an effort to give U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to uncover banned weapons.
"To act without the legitimacy of the United Nations, to favor the use of force over law, is taking a heavy responsibility, " Chirac said.
At the Vatican, which is staunchly against war in Iraq, spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said "whoever decides that all peaceful means available under international law are exhausted assumes a grave responsibility before God, his own conscience and history."
With nearly 300, 000 U.S. and British troops in the Persian Gulf region poised to strike, Bush's most solid support has come from British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
"Back away from this confrontation now and future conflicts will be infinitely worse and more devastating in their effects, " Blair said during a critical debate Tuesday in the House of Commons.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard also said his government would commit 2, 000 troops to a U.S.-led attack. "I believe very strongly the position the government has taken is right, " Howard said.
In Tokyo, Koizumi described the ultimatum as "a very difficult decision" for Bush and reiterated his government's position that a new U.N. resolution authorizing an attack was not needed.
Japan's constitution bars its armed forces from fighting in foreign wars, but Koizumi's government reportedly was considering humanitarian missions.
In Mexico City, President Vicente Fox said that he regrets that the conflict appears headed for war, but that his nation's opposition to military action would not strain relations with the United States.
Mexico, a member of the U.N. Security Council, had struggled with its position on Iraq. Fox walked a fine line between offending voters at home who overwhelmingly oppose war and antagonizing the United States, which accounts for about 75 percent of Mexico's trade.
"We maintain our belief that the diplomatic means to achieving (the goal) have not been exhausted, " Fox said.
In Indonesia, a government spokesman lamented the apparent breakdown of diplomacy. "We still believe that a solution to the crisis should be found within the U.N. Security Council, " spokesman Marty Natalegawa said.
The countdown to war has raised the prospect of a backlash by Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia, making it difficult to crack down on radical groups.
Outside main mosque in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta an Islamic activist made a dire warning.
"Don't blame the Muslims if the coming war in Iraq gives birth to thousands of new Osama bin Ladens, " said Habib Rizieq Shihab of the Islamic Defenders Front.
In New Zealand, Prime Minister Helen Clark said it was "highly debatable" whether a U.S.-led strike on Iraq would be justified under international law.
India issued a veiled criticism of U.S. unilateralism, while Pakistan planned an emergency session of Parliament on Wednesday to discuss Iraq.
South Korea previously has said it supports U.S. efforts to fight the spread of weapons of mass destruction and has indicated it may send military engineers to help assist U.S. troops in the war.
That diplomatic offensive came as Japan praised Bush for his decisive stance and Australia offered troops for his campaign — displaying some of the deep divisions around the world over Bush's demand that Saddam step down by Wednesday night or face war.
"It was a decision that had to be made, " Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi said.
Arab League Secretary-General Amr Moussa called off a possible last-minute peacemaking trip to Iraq on Tuesday, in what appeared to signal the end of Arab efforts to avert a war.
"Due to developments we've witnessed in the last few hours, it won't be possible for the secretary-general to visit Baghdad, " said his spokesman, Hisham Youssef.
Last week, Baghdad asked a high-level Arab League peace committee to indefinitely postpone a visit. Iraq has expressed unhappiness with the level of support it has received from a deeply divided Arab world.
Chinese President Hu Jintao, meanwhile, spoke by phone with his Russian and French counterparts, emphasizing Beijing's opposition to war with Iraq, the state-run Xinhua News Agency reported.
Hu, the Communist Party leader who replaced Jiang Zemin as president on Saturday, told Russian President Vladimir Putin that "the door to peace should not be shut and China has made great efforts in this regard, " Xinhua said. It said Hu expressed similar sentiments to French President Jacques Chirac.
The phone conversations followed an appeal by Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao at a news conference, his first since taking office this weekend, for "every effort" to avoid military conflict.
Putin on Monday condemned military action against Iraq, warning that war would be a mistake that could pose a grave risk to international security.
Germany and France also railed against Bush's tough stance.
"Does the threat posed by the Iraqi dictator justify a war, which is sure to kill thousands of innocent children, women and men? My answer in this case was and is: No, " German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder declared.
Chirac said a war without the support of the United Nations would undermine future efforts at peaceful disarmament. France led an effort to give U.N. weapons inspectors in Iraq more time to uncover banned weapons.
"To act without the legitimacy of the United Nations, to favor the use of force over law, is taking a heavy responsibility, " Chirac said.
At the Vatican, which is staunchly against war in Iraq, spokesman Joaquin Navarro-Valls said "whoever decides that all peaceful means available under international law are exhausted assumes a grave responsibility before God, his own conscience and history."
With nearly 300, 000 U.S. and British troops in the Persian Gulf region poised to strike, Bush's most solid support has come from British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
"Back away from this confrontation now and future conflicts will be infinitely worse and more devastating in their effects, " Blair said during a critical debate Tuesday in the House of Commons.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard also said his government would commit 2, 000 troops to a U.S.-led attack. "I believe very strongly the position the government has taken is right, " Howard said.
In Tokyo, Koizumi described the ultimatum as "a very difficult decision" for Bush and reiterated his government's position that a new U.N. resolution authorizing an attack was not needed.
Japan's constitution bars its armed forces from fighting in foreign wars, but Koizumi's government reportedly was considering humanitarian missions.
In Mexico City, President Vicente Fox said that he regrets that the conflict appears headed for war, but that his nation's opposition to military action would not strain relations with the United States.
Mexico, a member of the U.N. Security Council, had struggled with its position on Iraq. Fox walked a fine line between offending voters at home who overwhelmingly oppose war and antagonizing the United States, which accounts for about 75 percent of Mexico's trade.
"We maintain our belief that the diplomatic means to achieving (the goal) have not been exhausted, " Fox said.
In Indonesia, a government spokesman lamented the apparent breakdown of diplomacy. "We still believe that a solution to the crisis should be found within the U.N. Security Council, " spokesman Marty Natalegawa said.
The countdown to war has raised the prospect of a backlash by Muslims in Indonesia and Malaysia, making it difficult to crack down on radical groups.
Outside main mosque in the Indonesian capital of Jakarta an Islamic activist made a dire warning.
"Don't blame the Muslims if the coming war in Iraq gives birth to thousands of new Osama bin Ladens, " said Habib Rizieq Shihab of the Islamic Defenders Front.
In New Zealand, Prime Minister Helen Clark said it was "highly debatable" whether a U.S.-led strike on Iraq would be justified under international law.
India issued a veiled criticism of U.S. unilateralism, while Pakistan planned an emergency session of Parliament on Wednesday to discuss Iraq.
South Korea previously has said it supports U.S. efforts to fight the spread of weapons of mass destruction and has indicated it may send military engineers to help assist U.S. troops in the war.
Drogi Stworku
Po pierwsze. Zaczynam zdanie od "A więc..." ponieważ tak mi się właśnie podoba i uważam, że tak naprawdę tylko ja decyduję, jaki mojej wypowiedzi nadać kształt stylistyczny i kompozycyjny. Jeżeli nie chcesz, to nie zaczynaj tak swoich zdań, mnie to wszystko jedno. I jak już napisałem, będę sobie zaczynał zdania od dowolnych liter, wyrazów, tudzież sformułowań, nawet od "właśnie" jeżeli mi się akurat zachce.
Po drugie: cechą samego siebie? Uważasz więc, że braki w rozumowaniu są cechą samego siebie? To znaczy moją, czy Twoją? Mnie chodzi raczej o to, że pewne luki, tworzące się na wskutek zbyt szybkiego, lub intensywnego przetwarzania danych, zapełnia się niejednokrotnie zwykłą ironią. Ale uwaga. Nie było to jakieś szczególnie personalne stwierdzenie. Odnosi bardziej do ogółu, niźli akurat do Ciebie. To po drugie, a zarazem trzecie, chciałaś bowiem wiedzieć, co to znaczy "braki w rozumowaniu".
Muszę tu jeszcze napomknąć, że chyba nieszczególnie dobrze czytasz to, co piszę, albo masz pewne problemy z przyswajaniem treści filozoficznej, ponieważ zupełnie niepotrzebnie przesuwasz akcenty. Dlaczego interesujesz się zagadnieniami związanymi bezpośrednio z jedną tylko częścią metafory? Dlaczego interesuje Cię, czy cecha jest osobnym bytem, skoro ta cecha jest jedynie dwuwymiarowym obrazem, służącym do poruszania się między wierszami. Doprawdy tego nie rozumiem.
Po następne: ta różnica jest jak nabardziej oczywista. Twoje zobrazowanie problemu jako różnica pomiędzy 3-7 a 7-3, ma się do tego co napisałem, jak różnica między tramwajem lini dwa, a dwoma tramwajami. Zakres i granice stylu schodzą w tym przypadku zupełnie na drugi punkt, a filozoficzne wynurzenia, które mi serwujesz nijak się mają do zadanego przeze mnie pytania. Prostego i oczywistego. Niepotrzebnie rozbierasz zdanie na czyniki pierwsze i zabawiasz się tylko z tymi jego częściami, które akurat są Ci na rękę. A ja się pytam: po co? I nie musisz się martwić o definicję stylu. Ta słownikowa jest wystarczająco uniwersalna, pasująca do każdego ustroju. Co najwyżej jest przez poszczególne jednostki inaczej odbierana, ale to bez znaczenia.
I po ostatnie w końcu: Trochę mnie tu czarujesz z tymi autoobserwacjami. Widzę tu wyraźnie pewną zawiązkę daleko posuniętego samokreowania. Twoje teksty i słowne przepychanki z innymi (między innymi mną) są niczym innym, jak zaznaczeniem przez Ciebie, Twojego własnego terenu, którego nikt nie powinien przekraczać. Ot co ja myślę o całej sprawie.
Pozostaję w niezmienionym szacunku.
Po drugie: cechą samego siebie? Uważasz więc, że braki w rozumowaniu są cechą samego siebie? To znaczy moją, czy Twoją? Mnie chodzi raczej o to, że pewne luki, tworzące się na wskutek zbyt szybkiego, lub intensywnego przetwarzania danych, zapełnia się niejednokrotnie zwykłą ironią. Ale uwaga. Nie było to jakieś szczególnie personalne stwierdzenie. Odnosi bardziej do ogółu, niźli akurat do Ciebie. To po drugie, a zarazem trzecie, chciałaś bowiem wiedzieć, co to znaczy "braki w rozumowaniu".
Muszę tu jeszcze napomknąć, że chyba nieszczególnie dobrze czytasz to, co piszę, albo masz pewne problemy z przyswajaniem treści filozoficznej, ponieważ zupełnie niepotrzebnie przesuwasz akcenty. Dlaczego interesujesz się zagadnieniami związanymi bezpośrednio z jedną tylko częścią metafory? Dlaczego interesuje Cię, czy cecha jest osobnym bytem, skoro ta cecha jest jedynie dwuwymiarowym obrazem, służącym do poruszania się między wierszami. Doprawdy tego nie rozumiem.
Po następne: ta różnica jest jak nabardziej oczywista. Twoje zobrazowanie problemu jako różnica pomiędzy 3-7 a 7-3, ma się do tego co napisałem, jak różnica między tramwajem lini dwa, a dwoma tramwajami. Zakres i granice stylu schodzą w tym przypadku zupełnie na drugi punkt, a filozoficzne wynurzenia, które mi serwujesz nijak się mają do zadanego przeze mnie pytania. Prostego i oczywistego. Niepotrzebnie rozbierasz zdanie na czyniki pierwsze i zabawiasz się tylko z tymi jego częściami, które akurat są Ci na rękę. A ja się pytam: po co? I nie musisz się martwić o definicję stylu. Ta słownikowa jest wystarczająco uniwersalna, pasująca do każdego ustroju. Co najwyżej jest przez poszczególne jednostki inaczej odbierana, ale to bez znaczenia.
I po ostatnie w końcu: Trochę mnie tu czarujesz z tymi autoobserwacjami. Widzę tu wyraźnie pewną zawiązkę daleko posuniętego samokreowania. Twoje teksty i słowne przepychanki z innymi (między innymi mną) są niczym innym, jak zaznaczeniem przez Ciebie, Twojego własnego terenu, którego nikt nie powinien przekraczać. Ot co ja myślę o całej sprawie.
Pozostaję w niezmienionym szacunku.